D. Discrimination: The different and unfair treatment of certain groups of people based on specific characteristics, such as race, religion, age, sex, disability, sexual orientation, or gender identity.
That crashing sound you heard Monday morning was waves of change breaching the levees of the evangelical Christian world when one of its most venerable icons, the Rev. While his name may not be as familiar outside the evangelical bubble as his contemporary, the Rev. Billy Graham, Campolo, 80, is undeniably a pillar of the evangelical world and has been for close to 60 years. Both Campolo and Graham, 96, are best known and beloved first and foremost as preachers largely unencumbered by overt denominational or political biases.
Like Graham, Campolo also has been a spiritual counselor to U. Since I first heard him deliver a version of it during chapel when I was a student at Wheaton College in 1989, I cannot recall a single Holy Week passing without hearing his classic homily at least once.
Graham and Campolo, both Baptist by tradition and creed, have been among the leading voices of mainstream evangelicalism, and their influence spans several generations. Together they helped shape the direction and expansiveness of the church as it attempted to navigate H. As a Christian, my responsibility is not to condemn or reject gay people, but rather to love and embrace them, and to endeavor to draw them into the fellowship of the Church. Rest assured that I have already heard — and in some cases made — every kind of biblical argument against gay marriage…Obviously, people of good will can What does the D in Lgbtq mean?
do read the scriptures very differently when it comes to controversial issues, and I am painfully aware that there are ways I could be wrong about this one. However, I am old enough to remember when we in the Church made strong biblical cases for keeping women out of teaching roles in the Church, and when divorced and remarried people often were excluded from fellowship altogether on the basis of scripture.
Not long before What does the D in Lgbtq mean?, some Christians even made biblical cases supporting slavery. Many of those people were sincere believers, but most of us now agree that they were wrong.
I am What does the D in Lgbtq mean? we are making the same kind of mistake again, which is why I am speaking out. Quintessential Campolo, ever the straight-shooter. Clockwise from top left: Graham, Campolo, Stewart, Letterman. Images via The Billy Graham Association, TonyCampolo. Campolo is messy and unbridled. That is part of his vast appeal in a religious milieu that is too-often concerned with the appearance of perfection. In certain quarters of the Big Top tent that is evangelicalism in the United States, his passion for social justice and for life in general has been less than welcome.
First, while you were sleeping last night, 30,000 kids died of starvation or diseases related to malnutrition. Either way, Campolo, like Graham, What does the D in Lgbtq mean? a revered elder of the American church writ large, even if he has more of a propensity toward the social gospel than Graham.
Stop to think about What does the D in Lgbtq mean?. The people who started this country, George Washington, Jefferson, Hamilton, these were not conservatives; these were the radicals of the time. In fact, conservatives always look back on people who they despised and make them into heroes.
If you were to listen to the religious right today, What does the D in Lgbtq mean? would make you believe that Martin Luther King was one of their flock. In reality, they hated him and did everything they could to destroy him.
The other emphasis is to bring people into a personal, transforming relationship with Christ, where they feel the joy and the love of God in their lives. In his statement, Campolo explained how he arrived at this watershed moment: Because of my open concern for social justice, in recent years I have been asked the same question over and over again: Are you ready to fully accept into the Church those gay Christian couples who have made a lifetime commitment to one another?
While I have always tried to communicate grace and understanding to people on both sides of the issue, my answer to that question has always been somewhat ambiguous.
One reason for that ambiguity was that I felt I could do more good for my gay and lesbian brothers and sisters by serving as a bridge person, encouraging the rest of the Church to reach out in love and truly get to know them. The other reason was that, like so many other Christians, I was deeply uncertain about what was right.
It has taken countless hours of prayer, study, conversation and emotional turmoil to bring me to the place where I am finally ready to call for the full acceptance of Christian gay couples into the Church. Cathleen is the author of five non-fiction books including The God Factor, Sin Boldly, The Dude Abides, and most recently Disquiet Time: Rants and Reflections on the Good Book by the Skeptical, the Faithful, and a Few Rascals. She is an alumna of Wheaton College and holds graduate degrees from Garrett-Evangelical Theological Seminary and Northwestern University.
None of the words I know, like ironic or poetic justice, could do justice to the gift that such a turn of events would give us. The real key is what about 15 years ago when religious conservatives were putting Bush in power in the first place. I mean, this is indeed What does the D in Lgbtq mean?
momentous, and welcomed, announcement by Campolo—but for whom, really? As Cathleen affirms, this is a very big deal…. Wise as serpents, innocent as doves. The gay community itself has led the way, making themselves known and fighting for justice. The business community followed next because gays are a vital part of the economic system. I think this is a bellwhether day and hope the fog of ignorance and arrogance continues to be cleared. It will be impossible for Christians of the future to bear the idea that they missed this easy moral question.
Cite anecdotes to alter the narrative and claim that they were pro-gay the whole time. You see the same thing happening for slavery, civil rights movement, and so forth. This adversarial or separatist mindset has caused them to also resist progress in the areas of racial and gender equality. He sees this issue as the red line his church will never cross. I did not know such men existed in the evangelical movement still today.
It is refreshing to read about this man and his work. This man does not seem to seek out the kind of media attention that the Religious Right does, but he should and he should do so loudly and completely. He notes that he preaches from the perspective of what Jesus taught in the Sermon on the Mount and the Gospels, not what the so-called Christian leadership is spewing today as religion. Perhaps it is time to call the Religious Right leadership what they really are — Armageddon embracing, religiously intolerant, money grubbing liars who are more interested in power and wealth than in anything that Jesus ever stood for.
Perhaps most Christians who are more like Campolo than Graham, should stand up and call these clowns out when they come with their special services and tent shows, instead of getting swept up in the hysteria that these events sometimes engender. I know I get in their faces when they come to my small town, and when you ask them a question like the opener Campolo uses, they stop dead in their tracks and then quickly change the subject.
Second, the complementary union of a man and woman. It is the blend of masculinity and femininity. The wisdom of logic and intuition united. Strength and delicacy perfectly balanced. Protection and nurture combined as one. Third and most significant, the blend of a father and mother combined in a child. How disgraceful and demeaning to the role of a mother and father, the very birthplace of every single other relationship that exists!
From a social science perspective, at its most basic essence marriage is a pan-cultural constraint on evolutionary mating behavior. Ss couples are a failure of mating behavior making ss marriage an oxymoron. It has never established itself and spread.
The current period is far too short to be a What does the D in Lgbtq mean?. Finally, from a Biblical perspective The only authority for a true Christianmarriage between a man and woman is affirmed in the very first chapter of the Bible, and specifically affirmed by Christ and Paul. Repent, Richard, and sin no more… at least in this subject and genre!
But most Biblical scholars realize that the Gospels were written 60-90 years after Christ returned to heaven so they can be excused for fuzzy memories at best. You clearly know no gay couples, or you would never characterize Heterosexual relationships as being uniquely complex. We are each blends of masculine and feminine internally. And the diversity of this internal balance is not restricted to gender or sexuality, but is What does the D in Lgbtq mean? huge and kaleidoscopic spectrum of experience and perspective.
It demeans no child or parent for gay couples to take care of children the rest of you have no time for. How are you insulted by this? How sensitive and weak your little marriage must be, your sense of yourself as a parent. Social science is not a consensus, it is an ongoing discipline.
Historically, the Romans dominated Europe for centuries through torture and brutality. These are the people who brought your style of Christianity into the Western world.
Are you seriously suggesting that social patterns among humans are fixed or should be? Children are to be killed for disobedience. God specifically instructs the killing of pregnant women. But if you wish to cherry pick, then deal with this: in heaven there is no male or female. Please tell me the tortuous way you manage to process that and hang on to your narrow, oppressive ideas of sex and sexuality.
Have your children disobeyed you? Why are they walking around? Do you have a mortgage? Do you believe that women should be killed for adultery, or that gays should be killed for being gay? The rest of us are saying as clearly as we can…. And the Holy Spirit will cry tears of joy. I have nothing against Pastor Tony…I do object to the hypocrisy and venom of the commentors.
I did not claim ss couples were not complex in their own right as you seem to be confused about. At a simple level, obviously two elements are more complex than one element duplicated. When you consider the complexity of uniting two distinct sexes, that complexity is compounded at every level of existence. I find it hard to take your response here as honest. If the blend of masculinity and femininity were as mixed as you insinuate, we would not distinguish gender identity.
It is evidenced in such intimate ways as the complementary union of a penis and vagina. Or even more so, two men will What does the D in Lgbtq mean? provide the complement that a wife birthing the literal blend of the couple in a child does. Where did I suggest that default parenting situations demean a child?
Frankly I think it is a sad attempt at deliberate diversion from the point I did make. The only ones demeaned are your parents by you in denying that blessing. Once again you are confused. There is a difference between historical social science and evolving social science.
The fact remains that across cultures throughout history, the primary motivation for marriage has been the bond that children create. In fact, the reason marriage is falling out of favor is exactly because we have removed consideration of children by birth control, divorce and abortion.
Now the attempt to equate ss couples to marriage has required that we reject the idea that a father or mother are important. What a perversion of history and a cheap attempt to desecrate Christianity! Roman already ruled the civilized world when Christianity was birthed. And once again, you attempt to avoid my point by distorting what was said.
It has never established itself and spread.
Moreover, Christianity was nowhere around for the vast majority of that time! Only your bigotry is responsible for your blame. It is the very first relationship noted in the Bible. It is quoted by no one less than Jesus and Paul! Where does it say there is not male and female in heaven?
Did you know that in our time shellfish is 20% of the seafood consumed and 80% of the seafood poisoning? Your marriage must be very weak. Your sense of your own worth must be weaker still. Why else do you feel this desperate need to decide for other people how they can live?
I know What does the D in Lgbtq mean? Bible well. It is worthless, but for two saving graces the sermon on the mount and Matthew 23. Without understanding those, you know nothing about why Jesus matters.
You might as well be a Muslim or a Buddhist or a Hindu, if what matters to you is ritual purity. But none of that matters, Greg. Because you and your faction lost this a long time ago. The church has zero credibility about sex and marriage.
The Bible is absolutely incoherent on the subject and your ignorance of cross-cultural social history with regard to gender relations is truly vast — try reading instead of talking.
The church is dying, and you are helping kill it. What other feelings that have traditionally been contrary to the Biblical world view should be accepted in this new world order? Where did I dictate how other people live? I simply noted the reality that a ss couple can never come near to equating to marriage. As to ss couples and marriage?
How will a manipulated court ruling change the distinctions I note? There never was a contest Ken. Or is it off limits, too messy. That activity is now encouraged and blessed within the context of a committed gay relationship right? It should be lauded in Song of Solomon right?
We should lift it up as an ideal — something God ordains. Partly because in the meantime, the rock has been lifted up on the sexual practices of so many who condemn.
Partly because people have learned that institutions lie constantly to protect themselves. My son and mt friends are so much more important to me than what any so called Christian thinks about what some tribe in the desert wrote down about what they thought God thought about other people. Words that falsely describe reality are lies. It is a lie that ss couples equate to the complexity and complementary union of a husband and wife or the combined blend of a father and mother in a child.
Why would anyone want to legitimize their relationship with a lie? Words that falsely describe reality are lies. It is a lie that ss couples equate to the complexity and complementary union of a husband and wife or the combined blend of a father and mother in a child.
Why would anyone want to legitimize their relationship with a lie? Second, the complementary union of a man and woman. It is the blend of masculinity and femininity. The wisdom of What does the D in Lgbtq mean? and intuition united. Strength and delicacy perfectly balanced. Protection and nurture combined as one. Third and most significant, the blend of a father and mother combined in a child.
How disgraceful and demeaning to the role of a mother and father, the very birthplace of every single other relationship that exists! From a social science perspective, at its most basic essence marriage is a pan-cultural constraint on evolutionary mating behavior.
Ss couples are a failure of mating behavior making ss marriage an oxymoron. It has never established itself and spread. The current period is far too short to be a change. Finally, from a Biblical perspective The only authority for a true Christianmarriage between a man and woman is affirmed in the very first chapter of the Bible, and specifically affirmed by Christ and Paul. Your desire to hurt people and deny children loving adoptive homes is what makes you hateful.
You are so evil you want to hurt an orphan!!! Other wise just crawl into a hole and hate the world because it has left you behind. But on this matter, I must respectfully disagree. While I support marriage equality in civil society, the bible is clear on the design for and definition of marriage for believers.
We are called as believers to overcome such predispositions that drag us into sin through the power of the Holy Spirit. I also agree that the church must be inclusive to people struggling with this sin issue and every other sin issue.
We must do a better job of loving and welcoming gay and lesbian people, and we need to stop using our political influence to discriminate against them by promoting laws based on our biblical beliefs. But loving them means we tell them the truth about their lifestyle, we pray with them and for them for grace and mercy and power to gain victory over their sin, and we fellowship with them to bring them fully into the family of God and the church. It is only through authentic relationship that we are able to have an impact through What does the D in Lgbtq mean?
power of the Holy Spirit. Second, the complementary union of a man and woman. It is the blend of masculinity and femininity. The wisdom of logic and intuition united. Strength and delicacy perfectly balanced. Protection and nurture combined as one. Third and most significant, the blend of a father and mother combined in a child. How disgraceful and demeaning to the role of a mother and father, the very birthplace of every single other relationship that exists!
From a social science perspective, at its most basic essence marriage is a pan-cultural constraint on evolutionary mating behavior. Ss couples are a failure of mating behavior making ss marriage an oxymoron.
It has never established itself and spread. The current period is far too short to be a change. Human history can not be sorted into neat little boxes. The current period is as long or short as any other. Same-sex marriage is normalized and legal and establish, even in societies that have vehemently opposed it based on religious ideology. Not exactly what I was looking for in a rational argument. Perhaps take some time, head down to the library.
Careful though, there be dragons there. How are those Churches that reject Biblical teachings doing these days? If you truly are a Believer then why do you not heed the warnings. You claim that shell fish are forbidden, I guess you have not gotten into the New Testament where the dietary laws and ceremonial laws were done away with.
As far as sexual immorality, they were not done away with. You can find references to them in many of What does the D in Lgbtq mean? letters to the Churches. If you need help in finding those start in Romans.
Deny him the love they claim for themselves. Read Matthew 23, preferably in the Message version. Maybe you will understand it this time? This is for you as well, your Pride is getting the best of you. It is not all that you did for these Churches that matter, it is the life you lead and the path you follow. I am going to leave you with some scripture on why this is a big issue and one not to be taken lightly because many today are being mislead to think that they are Saved, but are not and the proof is in the life they lead and the blind eyes they turn to the Truth.
The reality remains: Ss couples can never equate to marriage, they will always have a clearly inferior counterfeit. Do you understand the impact of that?
Do you understand the resentment that breeds when the lie is forced on others? At the expense of children no less? However, even science does not understand homosexuality What does the D in Lgbtq What does the D in Lgbtq mean?. But more importantly, history has not understood homosexuality. It is not just Christianity that has seen homosexuality as abnormal, but many cultures throughout history. The aspect of anal sex is a primary reason.
Jesus did mention homosexuality in Matthew 19 when he gave the Disciples three options to marriage. I understand that is an incredibly difficult situation, the passage even notes it. However that is what the Bible says whether you or Tony accept it. The matriarchal societies and the sacredness of those of two minds…homosexuals. The social structures that accepted the need for intimacy without the possibility of producing a child in lean times. A two spirit was both.
Literal homosexuality was never accepted by Indians, that is why they dressed as women. Perhaps you would like to try another culture, say Greeks? Who judges what a lie is? Your bible cannot withstand historical or scientific fact so your bible is of no authority at all- yet you sit behind your computer condemning others. But in the Bible, marriage is the law of God, one man, one woman. Gays are sinners just as we all of what sins we committ.
We love all but same sex is a sin. Therefore, it cannot be acceptable because it is a sin. No other sin has become such a explosion of having to accept as same sex. And, if one disagrees, then extremist gays become disgruntled.
But I do not What does the D in Lgbtq mean? you to be forced to accept my sin. Second, the complementary union of a man and woman. It is What does the D in Lgbtq mean? blend of masculinity and femininity. The wisdom of logic and intuition united. Strength and delicacy perfectly balanced. Protection and nurture combined as one.
Third and most significant, the blend of a father and mother combined in a child. How disgraceful and demeaning to the role of a mother and father, the very birthplace of every single other relationship that exists! From a social science perspective, at its most basic essence marriage is a pan-cultural constraint on evolutionary mating behavior.
Ss couples are a failure of mating behavior making ss marriage an oxymoron. It has never established itself and spread. The current period is far too short to be a change. There you go, no Bible. Ss couples have every right to establish their relational identity just like heterosexual couples have. Get a lawyer if you want a contract.
I note three significant core distinctions that have separated marriage from other relationships in every culture. Ss couples are completely incapable of equating to a single one.
That is why not one single culture has ever fully accepted or legalized ss couples as married in one single culture in all of the 8,000 years of human history. Ss couples have every right to establish their own relational identity just like heterosexual couples have. You have no right to dumb down marriage to a contract between two consenting What does the D in Lgbtq mean?, something countless relationships equate to, so ss couples can finally qualify.
Not even getting close to the complexity of male and female distinctions. Is that what your mother and father called you? I chose to grow and live in the complexity of the 21st century. No one is bound to your definition. As far as a child missing one gender parent, better to have a loving home with two parents regardless their gender.
Aging out of a poorly funded system that receives little oversight is no place for a child. Your account makes it quite clear that this particular journey is a natural outgrowth of years of progressive ministry. I noted key elements of every normal marriage in history.
More often we are talking about broken families and worse, the deliberate birth of a child apart from one real parent. Second, if you really cared about the child you would try to place that child in the most natural setting. Even the child knows that. I noted the significant elements of all marriages throughout history. The closest a ss couple can come to marriage is marrage. Most children are not not adopted by ss couples, they are from broken relationships and worse, deliberately birthed apart from one real parent.
Moreover, a person who really cares about the best interests of a child will seek the most natural setting for that child, with a father and mother role. Anybody who feels the need to respond personally to dozens and dozens of comments on a thread about gays must be really threatened and conflicted inside. Everyone around him gets to be happy but him.
That must be so depressing. You have no right to What does the D in Lgbtq mean? down marriage to a contract between two consenting adults, something countless relationships equate to, so ss couples can finally qualify.
The What does the D in Lgbtq mean? of it is just a lot of words in your head, full of sound and fury, signifying nothing. I encourage you to do the investigation yourself, but I am probably talking to the wind. Why would I be near a breakdown?
Are you wishing something evil like that? You are right, the issue is not complicated. You wave that piece of paper and I still simply point out: 1. Your relationship is vastly less complex than marriage between a man and woman. A duplicate sex can never provide the complementary elements opposite sexes do. It is impossible at any level of comparison.
Your relationship will never bear the blended fruit of a child. No matter what piece of paper you wave, you will never be able to impose the idiotic, depraved distortion of marriage on decent people. There is not one thing you can do about it.
There is not one thing you can do about it. Now my tribe is doing the shaping and it too is composed of decent people. You can call it an imposition if you want.
There is not one thing you can do about it. For instance, I noted how it is impossible for ss couples to equate to marriage. You are unable to even begin to address that reality. It is exactly why I noted you waving your piece of paper. The reality remains the closest you come to marriage is marrage. You have changed nothing with that denial.
The papers my friends wave look exactly the same, also. Some of us are religious, others are not. The reality is you have no clue who among us are what. And we are all decent people. The reality remains the closest you come to marriage is marriage. I just replied to him probably in vain that he has clearly stated his viewpoint and does not need to repeat it.
It is What does the D in Lgbtq mean?, stupid, and also very self indulgent. A marriage is two people joining their lives together in the eyes of the government in order to obtain legal recourse to spousal responsibilities and benefits.
Your relationship is vastly less complex than marriage between a man and woman. A duplicate sex can never provide the complementary elements opposite sexes do. It is impossible at any level of comparison. Your relationship will never bear the blended fruit of a child.
Gay couples are seeking the same thing in marriage that heterosexual couples are seeking…love, support, and the legal protections that come with marriage medical rights and visitations, holding property in common, etc.
Marriage is the term we use for this relationship. Words that falsely describe reality are lies. I noted significant distinctions that make calling ss couples married a lie. Get your own relational identity, dumb it down to government recognition, it just never will equal marriage.
Do you really want to get in a contest about the worst behavior of orientations? Another mark of your maturity. I noted that marriage normally procreates.
In fact gays need protection to abusively mimic heterosexual intimacy! A key reason why decent people see it as a desecration, marrage at the most. Come back when you are ready to have an adult, rational discussion. Many of those benefits and rights came to support a mother and the children the couple procreated.
Moreover, many relationships have established their own rights and privileges without imposing a fraud on marriage.
Why Tony Campolo’s LGBTQ Reversal is Evangelicalism’s Tipping Point
Have the self-respect to establish your own. Even a child can see the difference, especially if one couple is mom and dad. You did that all on your own. Like women getting the right to vote? And no up-voting your own twisted comments! This resembles what it will be like to be separated from God… no hell, fire, brimestone, et al… just silence!
For those who are unbelievers, 24 hours per day for eternity of prerecorded evangelical, fundamentalist, wacky sermons and broadcasts, plus Rush Limbaugh thrown in for good measure!
And there will be no more money to pay yourselves in. Are you trying to get in front of the Supremes by getting your ridiculous argument out, or are you trying to convince yourself, or what? WorldNut Daily might be interested. The unchurched, however, are coming back, and we intelligent, caring ministers and congregants are giving them hope again.
All these people, single and married, needed was love, acceptance, and hope! You are a true zealot and rabblerouser of ancient religious times!
I am going to leave you with a bit of Scripture that you should take to heart. It is a strong warning, but then again you have may head it before and just overlooked it. I was raised an evangelical xtian but realized mid-life of the silliness of religion and cleared my head of working both sides of the street. You sound like you are not following your beliefs nor are you clear on the options.
How could he do that? Good luck on your journey. It takes great courage and character to go to an obviously extremely pro-gay marriage site and debate with intelligence, making logical points and counterpoints, rebutting, explaining in detail, etc.