Question: What was the rumor about Glaucus son Bellerophon?

Bellerophontes or Bellerophon was a great equestrian, a young man from Corinth, whose biggest dream was to have Pegasus for himself. Although Bellerophontes is supposed to be the son of King Glaucus of Corinth, there were rumors that his father was actually Poseidon, the God of the Sea.

Why did Proetus want Bellerophon killed?

Greatly upset, Proetus wanted to be rid of Bellerophon without having to accuse him publicly. He was also concerned about harming a house guest, as this was an offence to the gods. So, he sent Bellerophon to deliver a sealed message to his wifes father, King Iobates.

Who was Bellerophons father?

Glaucus Bellerophons father was Glaucus, who was the king of Corinth and the son of Sisyphus. Bellerophons grandsons Sarpedon and the younger Glaucus fought in the Trojan War.

How does Bellerophon show hubris in his myth?

The Myth Depicted Bellerophons fame grew, so did his hubris. Bellerophon felt that because of his victory over the Chimera he deserved to fly to Mount Olympus, the realm of the gods. However, this presumption angered Zeus and he sent a gad-fly to sting the horse causing Bellerophon to fall all the way back to Earth.

What happened between Anteia and Bellerophon in the Iliad?

The wife of King Proetus of Argos—named Anteia (in Homers telling) or Stheneboea (in the works of Hesiod and later writers)—loved Bellerophon; when he rejected her overtures, she falsely accused him to her husband. Proetus then sent Bellerophon to Iobates, the king of Lycia, with a message that he was to be slain.

Who slayed Chimera?

Bellerophon Chimera, in Greek mythology, a fire-breathing female monster resembling a lion in the forepart, a goat in the middle, and a dragon behind. She devastated Caria and Lycia until she was slain by Bellerophon.

What is the name of Daedaluss son?

Icarus Daedalus had two sons: Icarus and Iapyx, along with a nephew named either Talos, Calos, or Perdix. The Athenians made Cretan-born Daedalus Athenian-born, the grandson of the ancient king Erechtheus, claiming that Daedalus fled to Crete after killing his nephew.

Why was Zeus angry at Bellerophon?

Despite all of his successes, Bellerophontes was still not satisfied and sought to ascend to heaven on the back of Pegasos. Zeus was angered by his presumption and sent a gadfly to sting the horse, causing it to buck and cast the hero back down to earth.

Who were the 3 main furies?

The Roman goddesses of vengeance, the Furies lived in the underworld, where they tortured sinners. The children of Gaea and Uranus, they were usually characterized as three sisters: Alecto (“unceasing”), Tisiphone (“avenging murder”), and Megaera (“grudging”).

Who kills Daedalus?

The island on which his body was washed ashore was later named Icaria. Minos pursued Daedalus to Sicily and was killed there by the daughters of Cocalus, the king of the Sicani, with whom Daedalus was staying.

Why were the Furies called The Kindly Ones?

The Eumenides, or the Furies, were the Greek deities of divine vengeance and retribution. Because they were so terrifying, the Greeks sometimes referred to them as “The Kindly Ones,” not wanting to mention their names directly.

Did Hades have a daughter?

Melinoë Macaria fille dHéraclès Hades/Daughters

Who is the son of Poseidon and Medusa?

Chrysaor ChrysaorChrysaor, son of the Gorgon at the pediment of the Temple of Artemis in CorfuPersonal informationParentsPoseidon and MedusaSiblingsPegasus2 more rows

Retrieved What was the rumor about Glaucus son Bellerophon? 27 2022 from Two men meet on a battlefield; it is getting late, towards the close of a long day's fighting, the first since Achilles deserted the Greeks. The catalogue of this day's deadly confrontations, which has filled much of Books 4 and 5, looks as if it is about to get another victim's name appended to it. Homer introduces the episode at 6.

This, if nothing else, has made the meeting of Glaucus and Diomedes famous; with its amiable, irenic outcome, and its unique emphasis on mutual understanding, the scene is widely regarded as an oasis of common decency amid the war-ethos of the surrounding books.

This would, I think, be a misreading of Homer. The Iliad's understanding of war is more complex and more instructive than that of which Owen might be selected as a representative example, partly because in avoiding Owen's only too ready and self-conscious appeal to the tragic it also avoids his lapses into the sentimental.

With War and Peace we are only too aware of being on a different level. What at once puts Tolstoy in a different class from Owen is Tolstoy's awareness that there is no such simple construct as ~common humanity' which lies just beneath the surface in us all, waiting to be called up by a sudden recognition or some sickening experience.

Owen sees it differently; in bringing his two soldiers together after their deaths he tries to establish that the values they can still share are somehow intrinsic to human nature and not inseparable from their respective former backgrounds.

Tolstoy, however, knew that a common understanding among enemies, must have its roots in a shared culture and moral formation; for though it is often the conflicting symbols of public culture which armies carry before them into battle, it is the prompting of a common cultural discipline which causes individuals on both sides to challenge the prevailing ethos with freshly articulated values of their own.

Although Homer's ~common cultural formation' inevitably lacks the sheer historical scope of Tolstoy's, which reaches back to the shared cultures of the warring Byzantine and Holy Roman Empires, this very freedom from predictable historical associations makes Homer's analysis more sharply delineated, in the end more telling 6 And Homer is free from that fatally disabling distinction between history and myth; for Homer, of course, the past is neither ~history' nor ~myth' in the sense we give those words, but is rather something for which we do not have a word in which some aspects of both our notions of ~history' and ~myth' are combined.

An analysis of the meeting between Diomedes and What was the rumor about Glaucus son Bellerophon? in Iliad 6. I shall argue that, far from offering us the comforting view that human nature is basically quite civilized after all which, if true, would undermine what has already been established in Books 4 and 5the episode can be read as a discriminating critique of the Homeric hero's self-understanding and an evaluation of two contrasted attempts at self-appraisal.

I shall also suggest that the passage throws light on such Iliadic themes What was the rumor about Glaucus son Bellerophon? the relevance of the past to the present, the practical usefulness in life of having a trained sensibility, and even the purpose of poetry and how to interpret it.

This ~strange meeting', with its stranger consequences, turns on the question of identities. A Homeric hero's or heroine's identity, of which as Peradotto and Nagy have recently argued a name may, be a significant indicator 7is realized in the action of the narrative, and in a significant number of cases is articulated in a speech which may or may not bear out our assessment based on the narrative-action.

Insight into another's identity, which comes with an understanding of what lies behind the outer sign of the name or reputation, may itself become an important element in the dramatic narrative, as the case of Aeneas at 20.

His speech is a confident assertion of why ~who he is' will determine ~what he will be' in battle, of course, where it mattersof the implications of his identity for his performance and success. But despite echoing at 213-14 the introductory narrative formula used by Glaucus at 6. Daunted by the infinite capacity of language, Aeneas follows his genealogical narrative with an impatient outburst against the very What was the rumor about Glaucus son Bellerophon?

of understanding the likely course of one's life through articulated reflection upon one's identity. His impatience has near-fatal results in the context: when the fight gets under way, Aeneas has to be rescued by Poseidon from certain death at the hands of Achilles 293-339. The identity of Diomedes is not constructed or qualified like that.

Helenus' portrait of him, drawing on his achievements in Book 5, is a glowing testimonial to his martial character, and leads us to expect him to add another scalp to his collection when at 119 he meets Glaucus. We have heard of Glaucus only once before, right at the end of the Catalogue 2. In Book 5 he had included among his exploits assaults on the gods themselves including the wounding of Aphroditeconsciously undertaken since Athens had lifted from his eyes the mist which makes it impossible to distinguish men and gods in battle 5.

Diomedes needs to, in fact Apollo has made it necessary to, put a name to him before he can be recorded in Diomedes' list of battle victims. And to understand this, to interpret Apollo's cautionary words and apply them to himself, Diomedes has recourse to myth.

The mythical model he adopts for his present predicament, And which reveals the extent What was the rumor about Glaucus son Bellerophon? which he understands his situation, is the story of the resistance offered by Lycurgus, king of the Thracian Edones, to Dionysus and to his introduction of What was the rumor about Glaucus son Bellerophon?

cults into Greece. In revenge for this crime against his son, Zeus expresses the hatred of the gods by striking Lycurgus blind 138-40. This may seem a remote world from the battlefield around Troy, but Diomedes' story can be read as an object-lesson in the function of myth in the Iliadic narrative.

What is clear from 129 and 141 is that this story has a moral function here, since it is presented by Diomedes as an early precedent for his own caution.


It is the power of myth to inform and control behaviour which makes this story relevant to Diomedes: the point is not simply that the gods punish What was the rumor about Glaucus son Bellerophon?

who fight them, but that it is possible to win an initial success, as Lycurgus does here 132-5think oneself the winner against apparently insuperable odds, and then find oneself suffering an unforeseen and horrific change of fortune 138-40.

The poem's martial rhetoric imposes itself on the myth to show us Diomedes thinking of the past in terms of, and so with inevitable reference to, the present.

And to reinforce the notion of the relevance of the myth to this critical moment, the very moment when Diomedes, in failing to distinguish god from man on the battlefield, might reach the end-point, the point of reversal in his heroic career, the myth is closely tied into the narrative here in other respects too.

To return to Helenus: he describes 97-100 Diomedes scattering Hector and the Trojans much as Lycurgus drives back Dionysus and his followers: Helenus sends Hector back into the city to find relief and comfort at the hands of the women there, just as Dionysus has similar recourse to Thetis in her home under the sea.

The myth is in fact crucially positioned between Hector's departure from the battlefield and his reception by the women of Troy, above all Andromache. His reading of the past in the myth is as scrupulously self-interested as it is perceptive. Diomedes himself What was the rumor about Glaucus son Bellerophon?

What was the rumor about Glaucus son Bellerophon?

instantly recognized 145as Glaucus is introduced by the familiar patronymic device. Glaucus' opening lines are, however, an unexpected and astonishingly weak response to what has gone before, to the critical situation pressing around him. In contrast with Diomedes' shrewdness, Glaucus seems quite unable to read the situation intelligently.

The famous simile which follows 145-9comparing successive human generations to the recurring seasonal cycle, has been taken as an example of Homeric ~pathos' and ~compassion'. Sisyphus, his son Glaucus, and grandson Bellerophon lived at Ephyre, which he explains is in a What was the rumor about Glaucus son Bellerophon?

of Argos--odd information to be giving Diomedes, whose father is king of the place Ephyre is probably to be roughly identified with Corinth. The angry king cannot kill him himself because of his secret respect for him 167and so sends him to Anteia's father, the king of Lycia. At first things go well in Lycia. All these are unsuccessful, which persuades the king that Bellerophon cannot be such a monster after all, and What was the rumor about Glaucus son Bellerophon?

gets the king's other daughter in marriage the first was Anteia! Bellerophon has two sons and one daughter by his royal bride 196-7.

Bellerophon's daughter, Laodameia, makes the mistake of getting too close to the gods, and Artemis kills her 205 after she becomes involved with Zeus 198. Laodameia has failed to learn that basic lesson which Diomedes knows well and has just explained to Glaucus using the story of Lycurgus, that you must at all costs avoid making enemies among the gods 139-41. It is this which initially makes Diomedes cautious in respect of Glaucus, but Laodameia is rash enough to engage with a god in the kind of affair her father had been careful to avoid in Argos.

What does Glaucus make of all this? His What was the rumor about Glaucus son Bellerophon?, Hippolochus Bellerophon's other son at first seems lucky in escaping these omens of doom, but in his case they only await the next generation. It is not a promising sign, then, to find Glaucus initially treating the passing of generations as an inconsequential matter cf. Glaucus' family history, even as he tells it, stimulates thought about, and provides a model for, more than a son's bravery on the battlefield.

That this association between Glaucus and Bellerophon is not fanciful speculation is suggested by the rhetorical patterns in Glaucus' own speech, which does not use ~ring composition' like the two, companion speeches of Diomedes which surround it, but has its own internal logic of parallel associations. After his initial triumphs and prosperity Bellerophon is finally struck down by fate.

Such too will be the destiny of Glaucus, a fact which Homer expects his audience to remember, though Glaucus himself naturally gives not a hint of it here. Surviving this encounter with Diomedes, Glaucus will play a prominent role in the struggle around his cousin Sarpedon in Book 16, but will eventually outside the Iliad be brought down by Telamonian Ajax in the battle around the body of Achilles.

To this much more limited extent Glaucus shares with Achilles an ultimate fate which is only foreshadowed within the boundaries of the Iliad. Perhaps he observes the parallels between the changes of fortune suffered by Lycurgus at the hands of Zeus in his own myth and by Bellerophon at the hands of the gods in Lycia.

Diomedes is persuasive 42 and Glaucus obliges. Pressing the mythical precedent further, Diomedes suggests they repeat their grandfathers' exchange of gifts, but his intention is, I suggest, to exploit the advantage he has already established in discourse and realize it in material terms. Donlan is the first critic to offer a convincing explanation of the point of Homer's humour here, especially in 234-6 where Glaucus hands over his golden armour in exchange for Diomedes' bronze armour.

One reason for Glaucus being induced to hand over gold his armour for an inferior gift is the need to sustain the parallel with his grandfather's offering the gold cup to Oeneus in exchange for a leather belt 22045 and so to reinforce the notion of the past as a precedent for the present, a notion which, I have argued, is central to the role of myth in this section.

What was the rumor about Glaucus son Bellerophon?

But 234-6 point to more than a mythical parallel designed by Diomedes to teach Glaucus the significance he fails to see in his own family history. The humour arises in and from this dramatic illustration of the fatal character-flaw Glaucus has inherited from his ancestors. Diomedes has seen through him and, without the need for a fight, has demonstrated a superiority which Glaucus, in his comparative innocence, could never challenge.

If this seems a harsh judgement on Glaucus.

The Heroes — Perseus, Bellerophon, and Heracles

I had thought you the most intelligent man of all those who live What was the rumor about Glaucus son Bellerophon? fertile Lycia. But now I utterly condemn your judgement for what you have said, claiming that I would not stand up to enormous Ajax. To learn to read one s to learn to read all three. The episode of Diomedes and Glaucus offers an approach to reading the Iliad in a way which does justice to it as poem, history, and myth. The episode juxtaposes two attempts at reading myth, one masterful in its insights and capacity to make the past relevant to the present, the other shallow and simplistic, one which is persuasive in determining moral choices, the other failing to prevent one generation repeating the naive blunders of its predecessors.

Diomedes triumphs here, as intellectually supreme in his contest of wits with Glaucus as he is militarily supreme in the previous book. His triumph here is one which the reader of the Iliad is invited to emulate: the reader who can read the past as a constructive influence on our current moral choices and understand its formative value for our cultural perceptions, such a reader has a Diomedes-like advantage in all the ~strange meetings' that confront us nearer home.

Translations are usually taken from the recent Penguin Iliad of Martin Hammond, but they have been adapted to harmonize with the spelling and emphasis in my text. As in the introductory study by C.

Bowra, Homer London, 1972where the scene between Glaucus and Diomedes ~fits into the battle by providing a moment of delightful relaxation' p.

What was the rumor about Glaucus son Bellerophon?

Direct influence of the Iliad on War and Peace is very limited. Tolstoy didn't read the poem in Greek until the winter of 1870-1, a year after the publication of the last part of the novel.

For Tolstoy's dedication to Greek at this time see H. Sometimes he dreamt in Greek at night. J, Redfield, Nature and Culture in The Iliad Chicago, 1975 writes well on this without reference to Owen or Tolstoybut forces too sharp a disjunction between culture and nature: ~Culture, which appears to us in our social lives so solid and enduring, reveals itself on the battlefield for what it is.

For the warrior, culture appears as a translucent screen against the terror of nature p. But how else, except through the broader definition of culture, is our apprehension of ~the terror of nature' to be made articulate? For an extended critical comparison between the Iliad and War and Peace, see G. Steiner, Tolsto or Dostoevsky Harmondsworth, revised edition 1967especially pp. It is not concerned with the psychology of its heroes', pp.

There s a brief comparison in E. Greenwood's chapter' Tolstoy and Religion' in M. Nagy, The Best of the Achaeans: Concepts of the Hero in Archaic Greek Poetry Baltimore and London, 1980pp. Peradotto, Man in the Middle Voice: Name and Narration in the Odyssey, Princeton, 1990especially chapter 4 ~Polytropos: the naming of the subject'. Kirk adduces this parallel in his note on 6. For a brief comparison see K.

Reinhardt, Die Ilias und ihr Dichter Gottingen, 1961p 513. For an analysis of the construction of the Diomedes episode in Book 6, with a different emphasi from that adopted here, see O. Andersen, Die Diomedesgestalt in der Ilias Oslo. An elaboration of Homer's version of the story can be found in Nonnus, Dionysiaca 20. A different version emerges for us in the fourth stasimon of the Antigone 955-65 where it supplies the second of three examples of mortals who suffer incarceration.

This may have been influenced by t treatment in Aeschylus's Lycurgea triology T. Lohmann, Die Komposition der Reden in der Ilias Berlin, 1970p. I argue rather that the abbreviated narrative is evidence of how the poet selected from an already familiar story points to support the analogizing which binds the episode solidly into its context here.

Being aware of it is not, of course, the same thing as interpreting it correctly 23. Edwards' analysis of the simile in Homer, Poet of the Iliad Baltimore, 1987 ultimately sees in it ~the poet's own consciousness of the mortality of human greatness and of the consolation of the continuance of the human race' pp.

But see the important qualification of this view in M. There there is repeated renewal from the irrevocable, that renewal is tinged with futility in its reproduction of finality' p. Interestingly, when Apollo takes up the simile later 21. For the wider application of the simile see M. What was the rumor about Glaucus son Bellerophon?, ~Man and the Leaves: a Study of Mimnermus fr. Thalmann, Dramatic Art in Aeschylus's Seven Against Thebes Yale, 1978pp.

For the identification see Aristonicus's note ii. Homer suppresses mention of the move to Tiryns, because I suggest he wants to stress Bellerophon's continuing innocence, and so avoid reference to the miasma which drove him out of Corinth.

Anteia is What was the rumor about Glaucus son Bellerophon? in Euripides' play on the myth cf. Page's Loeb Greek Literary Papyri, pp. The only definite reference in Homer to writing', Kirk on 168-9. Kirk also discusses the possible identification of the or ~folded tablet'.

The one exception is its use in the sens of tomb' at 2. I take the suppression of any reference to Pegasus here see M. West on Hesiod, Theogony 325 to be a narratival ploy to keep mirabilia to a minimum in the whole account.

Leaf's proposed transposition of 200-2 to follow 205 is discussed with qualified approval by Kirk, ad loc. I argue that the function of this reversal in the episode as a whole is a more complex matter.

For the death of Glaucus see Apollod. The ~foreshadowing' of external events within the narrative of the poem is discussed by M. Edwards, The Iliad: a Commentary, Volume V: Books 17-20 Cambridge, 1991pp.

One important feature which distinguishes Glaucus' situation from that of Achilles is, as Edwards points out, that the latter ~is unique as the only character who knows in advance that his death is imminen p. We need to remember that Diomedes has already responded positively to his own cautionary tale by modifying his behaviour accordingly. See Kirk's analysis of his ~modified ring-form' on p. Donlan The Unequal Exchange between Glaucus and Diomedes in the Light of the Homeric Gift-Economy', Phoenix 43 19891-15 esp.

~No critic, ancient or modern, has satisfactorily explained What was the rumor about Glaucus son Bellerophon? bizarre incident and its unexpected change in ethos' Kirk on 234-6, unaware of Donlan's article. The view is sustainable only if we accept the notion that Homer ~withdraws for a moment fro his regular narrative mode' Kirk, p.

As Donlan states, the superiority of Diomedes in the episode had already been asserted by J. The significance of the parallel is noted by Donlan see n.

Contact us

Find us at the office

Cudd- Lehnert street no. 7, 84569 New Delhi, India

Give us a ring

Esly Garzone
+76 910 442 603
Mon - Fri, 10:00-16:00

Contact us