Background. The origin of the term friends with benefits is difficult to trace, although it is regularly used and practiced in todays society. The earliest known use of the term is documented in Alanis Morissettes 1995-1996 song Head Over Feet when she says, youre my best friend, best friend with benefits.
When did friends with benefits become a thing?Feeling always get in the way. By the 1990s, friends with benefits was an established term for two friends who have occasional casual sex. Interest in the phrase spiked in 2011 with the release of the rom-com Friends with Benefits, starring Mila Kunis and Justin Timberlake.
Who are called friends with benefits?A friends with benefits relationship is one in which two people are physically intimate with one another, yet theyre not committed to each other in any way. People involved in a friends with benefits relationship clearly enjoy spending time together, but their relationship isnt romantic and has no strings attached.
Young Adult Mental Health edited by Jon E. Young adulthood is a time of transition. Although it is a time of greater responsibilities, it is, to a certain extent, a time of personal exploration, with a moratorium on taking full adult roles. Young adulthood can be a period of emotional growth, with perhaps a deepening spiritual consciousness and a greater interest in the community-at-large.
Alternatively, decreased parental supervision and an absence of social control agents associated with moving away from home, combined with a not-fully-mature brain function, increase vulnerability to an assortment of psychiatric disorders, particularly those involving impulse dysregulation.
In Young Adult Mental Health, Jon E. Potenza have assembled a multidisciplinary group of authors to explore various aspects of this distinct developmental period. The first chapter, like all chapters in this book, starts with a vignette and Who coined friends with benefits?
Young Adult Mental Health
a compelling real-world case of an individual who overcame delinquency in youth, reversed course in his early 20s, and went on to a career as a surgeon. Risk taking, another hallmark of the transition from adolescence to adulthood, is explored in several other introductory chapters. These opening chapters, while somewhat theoretical, provide a foundation for a discussion on psychopathology later in the text.
The next series of chapters address healthy psychological development, emphasizing the more quotidian. The chapter on parenthood is primarily devoted to a hypothesis stating that women raised by insensitive caregivers choose reproductive strategies characterized by the rapid production of multiple children with different partners, perhaps explaining why some women have children at a very young age despite the social costs.
Another chapter presents research showing that marriage generally has salutary effects on mental health, possibly accounting for the overall strength of this institution despite trends of cohabitation and delay. The final 13 chapters describe psychiatric disorders, each chapter containing familiar subheadings epidemiology, etiology, treatment, etc and each emphasizing unique aspects to this cohort.
A chapter on obsessive-compulsive disorder distinct from a larger chapter on anxiety disorders notes that women have a bimodal age at onset, with a spike in Who coined friends with benefits? corresponding with life events such as pregnancy or miscarriage. There are several excellent chapters on substance disorders, including a description on how alcohol use peaks during young adulthood, often a result of being in an environment that promotes use, and generally declines by the third decade of life.
The book is packed with references and information, yet there is acknowledgment from many contributors of a dearth of clinical studies specifically pertaining to young adulthood. Those looking to formulate treatment decisions about this age group often must extrapolate from either adolescent or general adult data. Containing numerous such pearls, this book presents a scholarly, yet highly readable, panorama of the young adult period, appealing to both general clinicians and those with specialized interests.
Although he cited us,3 he overlooked the evidence we provided indicating that the Bacloville article4 was published without acknowledging major changes to the initial protocol, affecting the primary outcome.
Coincidentally although as skeptics, we do not believe in coincidencethe initial statistical team was changed when data were sold to the French pharmaceutical company applying for the marketing authorization in France.