Question: Why did my AOL email stop working?

Clear your browsers cache When emails go missing in AOL Mail, its often due to a few simple things; either the message is in the wrong folder, your third-party mail clients settings, or your account was deactivated due to inactivity.

Why has my AOL account stopped working?

Try clearing your browsers cache and cookies. The cache and cookies on your browser might prevent AOL Mail from loading or make it slower than usual. Disable the antivirus protection on your computer/device. ... In such a case, you simply have to wait a few minutes and then try accessing AOL Mail.

How do I get my AOL Mail back?

Launch the AOL app. Enter the AOL username or email address. Type the password and sign in to your AOL account. Now, you have successfully reactivated your AOL account.

How do I fix an AOL email error?

AOL Mail Connection Error AndroidStep 1:Tap the Settings option from Menu.Step 2:Touch the About Phone option followed by the System Update option.Step 3:Check for the system updates and then tap the Install the Update option to update the Operating System of your Android mobile phone.

Why does AOL keep telling me my password is wrong?

This error message means that the username and password combination you entered doesnt match what we have on record. Consider the following: Check caps lock or num lock keys - These keys change the value of what youre actually typing.

How do I get my AOL mail back on my iPhone?

Tap the Settings icon on your phones home screen.Tap email + accounts in the settings menu.Tap add an account.Tap on AOL. If you cannot find AOL in the list, tap other account.Type in your AOL email address and password.Tap sign in.

How do I fix an AOL error?

AOL Mail Connection Error AndroidStep 1:Tap the Settings option from Menu.Step 2:Touch the About Phone option followed by the System Update option.Step 3:Check for the system updates and then tap the Install the Update option to update the Operating System of your Android mobile phone.

Why is my AOL password not working?

If you get the message Invalid password. ... Reset your forgotten password online using the account recovery options you have available. Use a different browser. If youre using an older or outdated browser, such as Internet Explorer, you may need to access AOL Mail from a different browser.

Why does my Iphone keep telling me my AOL password is incorrect?

If you did enable 2FA on your AOL account, then you would need to generate an app-specific password for that account to use in either the Mail app on an iOS or Mac for that account in order to access it with an error message telling you that your password is wrong.

How do I reactivate my old Yahoo email account?

Heres how to reactivate your account from the Yahoo home page.On the Yahoo homepage, select Sign in.Enter your Yahoo email address, then select Next.If your account is recoverable, Select an option appears. ... Enter the verification code you received in the text or email message.More items...•Apr 11, 2021

Why cant I log into my AOL email?

Clear your browsers cookies. ... Use a different supported web browser. 4. Try logging into a different sign-in page, like our primary login page or the AOL Mail sign-in page.

How do we fix this? And even if you set Why did my AOL email stop working? up properly and host your email with Why did my AOL email stop working? responsible host, Microsoft will still mark your mail as spam.

Thus far, I'm able to send mail and not have it marked as spam at least to everyone that I've corresponded with thus far. It was a lot of work to get to that point, but not terrible. Prediction: Any distributed social media like Mastodon that gains mainstream popularity will share the same fate. Sure, Why did my AOL email stop working? be able to host your own Mastodon instance, but 99% of people will be on the top 10 hosts and they won't peer with you.

I think the only way to make distributed social media practical is to have an extremely inexpensive turnkey self-hosting solution for the average person.

There are just too many incentives to build walled gardens instead. I'm not sure what the competitive edge could be to not wall garden. It's always going to be more expensive to try to work with those who don't work with you. Going the self-host route, I'd still want a service of some sort so I didn't have to maintain it myself.

Almost like an evergreen program that self-hosts my data and Why did my AOL email stop working? and backups and transfers anything and everything. Everything would be accessible outside of the program as local human readable or viewable files where possible.

That'd be the best way to be non-walled garden. I've had several email providers die since the 1980s. Each time it was a major disruption in my life. The last time, I coped by mostly dispensing with email whenever possible. Hosting my own mail server, not subject to some provider's ideas of filtering, or simply vanishing in the night, would make email more attractive. It's not even a hobby. It looks pretty much like at least a part-time job. Weighing the options, I don't really need email that badly.

If only one entity does it, as far as I can imagine it is only a marketing statement to appeal to a niche demographic - people who care about it from an ideological standpoint. If more than one entity does it, it could lower the bar for critical mass.

Instead of having to get enough people on your platform to start benefiting from the network effect, you only have to get enough people on your platform and platforms that you have bidirectional integration with. Really, a format should be created e. It's literally the same exact concept over and over again, just wall gardened instead. So much wasted development time doing the exact same thing. That would be an open relay. That is simply not something that mail servers do anymore.

If one was to deliberately set up an open relay, one would find that their email server was blacklisted pretty much immediately. I don't think so, I believe open relays are virtually extinct. I self-host my mail for over 17 Why did my AOL email stop working?. Why allow emails without authentication? And that wasn't an easy task. Servers came online and went offline. Users logged in and out. Connections came up and went down. Email was barely functional most days.

Your best bet if you weren't an Internet God and weren't able to write your own super complicated sendmail. Email would be so amazing were it not for the spam problem. Relays were like p2p networks. It was actually beautiful in its simplicity and in a perfect world with everyone being good actors could have been incredible.

Open relays were offered in the spirit of cooperation that was characteristic of the early internet. Unfortunately, greedy people soon jumped in to take advantage of this generosity, resulting in a tragedy of the commons. John Gilmore used to run an open relay, and I used to get spam from it.

He was really stubborn about promoting the freedom of the spammers over the peace and quiet of the poor recipients. He eventually got shut down, still complaining. For 99% of the discussion you want on the platform, text is all you need.

For spammers and people who want to host porn, text alone is useless. Which is why spammers would bother. They need you to go visit something to make money. And the usual solution to scam postings on forums, is to prevent people from sharing any off-forum contact details, except maybe via forum private message.

It's fine if you are happy to live on individual instances and pretend that other instances do not exist, but they are not so great if you want a global audience.

In this sense, they are more like the random disjoint online forums of the early 2000s, and not so much like the large monolithic social networks that people have come to expect.

If anything, their story is more likely than not showing that the centralization is not going to happen. But if this is only a fight between admins, the intuition is that we would end up with the big instances constantly losing users to smaller ones created by those breaking away from the bad admins who would then federate among themselves. Because of this people will start hosting nodes for people. I assume this is unavoidable. The only solution are protocols where the network is owned and stored in Why did my AOL email stop working?

data cryptographically rather than in the servers. Then the servers apply censorship and rules over the data, but you can still rebuild any conversation chain as long as you connect to enough servers that don't censor it instead of requiring 1 server to keep all the network relationships.

This also allows authors to seamlessly switch servers without losing audience or at least being able to recreate it very easily. I suspect most users have been tricked into thinking they want massive, global social media platforms.

There are communities they'd rather be cut off from and words they'd rather not read. It's not a bug, it's a feature. Unfortunately, very influential companies that have figured out how to game our attention have tricked users into thinking they want something they don't. Spam is the root problem. With an enormous amount of complexity between that and the mail admin's day to day experience.

I hosted my own mail for more than 20 years. A couple years back I just got tired of trying to solve Why did my AOL email stop working? puzzles, plus the fears that deliverability issues generate. For me, switching to Fastmail hosting was a big win. Ok, if the amount of data is a problem, another option is to just download your mbox from Google takeout, treat it as an archive, and use something like notmuch to search your old mails.

You can then store and backup the mbox anywhere you want. In addition to the iCloud, I have a free ProtonMail account, which I use sparingly, and anything large or important that comes in there I move to local backup and delete.

If you set up pop3 you can auto delete from the server. I did some experiments back when I ran my own mail. Sending from my mail server to my Microsoft account it not only marked everything as spam, it continued marking everything as spam after I marked a bunch of them as not spam. After that, I tried also answering several of them and composing several new mails to send to my non-Microsoft email to see if Microsoft's spam system was smart enough to figure out that if I'm actively corresponding with someone their incoming mail should not be marked as spam.

It was not smart enough. On what grounds would they sue for? Email is not the post; there is no legal right to receive one or to have one routed. If one wants such legal protections, there is the post. Now, should there be such a right? But a world in which one exists would raise the bar to starting one's own email server even higher. It depends on the circumstances. In some cases, when guarantees are made and those guarantees are broken, you can sue civilly to be made whole in a context like this where there was no bodily harm, merely an opportunity missed.

It's real unlikely any such guarantees were made. To do so would be extremely foolish for several reasons the false-positive rate of spam identification is known and emails can fail to deliver because of an error at either end of the transaction. You only have a case if you have a contract with them that lays out specific duties, or if they are otherwise a fiduciary of some form.

Unless you signed a contract with microsoft for them to deliver your mail, they have no obligation to do so. Many of us do it. If you have any interest in the topic, either due to the fun of managing the servers and learning something along the way or due to the moral high ground of supporting decentralization above proprietary walled gardens, do it! Ignore the naysayers, if you're interested you can do it. Will some emails very occasionally end up in the spam folder of a recipient?

I mean, yes, but that is true of everything. You can end up in spam folder sending from Microsoft Office mail to gmail or vice versa. Heck, every now and then an email from my manager will end up in my spam folder in gmail even though he's emailing me from gmail to gmail, both of us in the same corporate gsuite account! So on average, once you set everything up correctly, your deliverability will be as good as gmail to gmail, which is to say not 100% perfect but no worse than any other solution.

And you'll be in control of your email infrastructure and address. The parent post mentions a useful safety valve to know about if you're worried about deliverability and want to take baby steps to get there. You can always, either selectively or wholesale, use a commercial relay for outbound mail from your email server. Personally I don't use any third party relay, I deliver to everywhere from my own infrastructure. Things like: this script crashed, or btrfs scrub finished + scrub results, and similar.

I don't even remember what the error was for this scenario, but it was just totally dead in the water. My main ongoing issue is that I had to add all my sending addresses things my internalhostnamehere myrealdomain. Thus, it does not work well if email is important for business-to-business use. I had exactly this problem too. If you keep an eye on your logs, when your emails are being blackholed it accepts them but it does not deliver them!

I've elaborated here: However this only works temporarily, after a month you're back in the doghouse. Only senders which send a large volume of legit traffic are allowed. It's ridiculous but sadly true. Please contact your Internet service provider since part of their network is on our block list. You can also refer your provider to. This was the same at outlook. Microsoft was the only party that had issues with my server. All known blocklists had no issues Why did my AOL email stop working?

it. Anyway going to that link there is a form somewhere to temporarily unblock it. Perhaps you can create an account at live. I thought of doing this but eventually I got so frustrated I gave up on it.

It's ridiculous but Why did my AOL email stop working? true. One potential 1%-of-the-complexity answer to the problem of personal notification which I presume was what email-to-self was solving is to set up a Telegram bot. It's the second approach that takes 3 minutes! It's really too much for an average person to handle. I've run into this with both Sam's Club and Speedway Rewards. Only thing I can think of is that some outbound mail service they're using is dropping them, or some relay in the middle is dropping them.

Other than that, it's pretty rare for my emails to be marked as spam. Outlook 365 seems to do it much more often than Gmail though. I never thought to relay mail internally to dkimproxy. I'll have to give that a shot. Perhaps this will offer a good solution!


This is also why I went with Vultr as my server host. They block port 25 by default Why did my AOL email stop working? make customers file a support ticket with them to unblock that port.

They also require your account be active for at least a month and be using their service in good standing during that time. Wasn't an instant process, but was simple enough to accomplish in the end. Also, see earlier point about oligopoly. I suggest you put thought into copypasta before putting it into a comment. Is there such a service that will tell me the reputation of an email domain, i.

I feel like, if there was such a service, it would be pretty useful to use it to prevent account registrations on other services, from users whose email addresses have domains with bad reputations. These can certainly be one and the same server; but it's not a requirement. So how often are they in practice? The problem with spam is that there's no real legal recourse for spam. If it's in your own country then maybe. But outside of your country? There's no deterrence and literally no criminal prosecution for spam.

No more big yellow warning boxes in Gmail when receiving mail from my own domain! I've been self-hosting email for about 20 years, from a dedicated server in Europe. No more so than with any other email host. As is so often the case, the people that say you should never do it probably have little relevant experience, they are just repeating something they heard. No more so than with any other email host. If you are the only person using your email server, your volume will be so low that the big providers Gmail, Outlook, etc.

So, ironically, being a low-volume sender means your email will be constantly classified as spam. My email server is used by two people.

Reputation is tracked by all the big providers, as evidenced by a my email not being classified as spam, and b them showing reputation of my domains in their various reputation dashboards. When you make a claim that supposedly applies to all people, a single counterpoint is sufficient to disprove the claim.

How does that make sense to you? I never got access to their dashboards because my email volume was so low. If you somehow did, good for you. How does that make sense to you? The Why did my AOL email stop working? of a single person successfully doing exactly that and there are numerous such people in this very thread is sufficient to disprove your claim.

The existence of a single person successfully doing exactly that and there are numerous such people in this very thread is sufficient to disprove your claim. This was all individual low-volume. Never found any reason for it. That said, I'll probably go back to hosting my own mail, and just live with certain parties being bad net citizens, eating the occasional mail without error or bounce.

It's not like I really expect them to do better. Although especially in the case of Gmail, it's a little like Disney eating up public domain stories and spitting out copyrighted and trademarked content. But those ships have sailed. If they have the desire to learn, it's likely not certain! After everything is working well, Why did my AOL email stop working?

you got that part right, the ongoing effort should basically just be keeping software up-to-date. You could always get unlucky and e. It's yet to happen to me, but my provider only offers dedicated servers, which are probably not so popular with spammers.

But that's quite a few 'if's. Their requirement for it applying to all people make it generally universally true.

Why did my AOL email stop working?

I remember once reading that they needed something in the range of a few thousand emails going to their servers. I've read that very low volume sending server can sometimes have issues, but never experienced it.

My outgoing volume is about as low as it gets since it's just me and some family that don't use it much, but don't experience any problems. More likely, they're saying that 99% of people don't know how to self-host, and for 99% of the rest it's not worth the trouble.

Also, if you have to ask, then you shouldn't self-host it. The tech world is particularly guilty of this, with veterans having forgotten that there was a time when they didn't know what they know, and lacking any patience to adequately help those seeking understanding. To add to the issue, the Internet proper is so noisy with partial or broken information that the task of finding the correct information is far more daunting than it was 20 years ago when I started learning.

We need to give newcomers a break and answer their questions well, and discuss to promote understanding, instead of swatting at them with our canes. The only way knowledge passes to the next generation Why did my AOL email stop working? thinkers and tinkers is if we fuel that curiousity. Running an email server, that is secure, is not easy. In the mean time, before you're qualified and know what you're doing, your mail server is a danger to others.

From being an open relay through just plain unpatched security vulnerabilities. It's not the consequences for you, it's the consequences your fuckups have for everyone else. There's plenty of other tech they can screw with. Asking the question in an open forum is doing the research on it. If you start self-hosting now, you should be prepared to lose quite a few emails randomly for the first X months while everyone else tries to figure out whether you're legit or not.

Though I would encourage anyone who can to try to self-host at least some part of their email infrastructure, even if just for the learning experience, I would also recommend that they avoid using self-hosted email for anything business-critical until they're sure they've got the hang of it. And then just start sending. The choice of registrar is under my control, though.

It doesn't cost anything beyond the cost of the domain name and is very easy. I'd love to know if there are any other registries that allow something similar. Whether it's worth the effort is a personal decision, but there's a lot of value in owning your own email so I recommend it to anyone who's curious about it and willing to do it.

If anyone asks, I say go for it. Worst case you'll learn new things, best case now you own Why did my AOL email stop working?

email. I'm in a similar boat, but have a slightly different conclusion: if you started 20 years ago, you'll have a much easier time today than if you started six months ago. I think it's also fair to say that personal Why did my AOL email stop working? for a small domain is much easier than even a small amount of transactional email and don't even try sending newsletters beyond your friend group. Another thing to note is that receiving mail is really easy.

Sending it is hard, filtering out the spam and only the spam from your inbound email is harder. Spam has become much easier to avoid on inbound mail at some point. I get maybe one spam mail every week or so, which I just delete. Spammers' scripts usually don't bother, they just try the first one and move on to the next address on their list. Of course, this is not 100% reliable, as it's not too difficult for spammers to adapt and improve their scripts.

Of course, vast majority of spammers are either not sophisticated enough, or do not care enough to do so, so if you don't mind your incoming mail to be slightly delayed, it's kind of a low-hanging fruit, as it cuts off a huge amount of low-effort spammers.

Yes, receiving is very easy. So a easy way to get started is to receive everything directly and use a commercial often with low-volume free tier service relay for outbound until you get comfortable enough to remove the training wheels. Or never remove them, that's a legit choice as well. I don't find that at all. Filtering spam is the easiest part.

Beyond that, apply a bayesian filter. I get no false positives and the spam that gets through to my inbox can be counted on one hand per quarter. That's yet another benefit of self hosting, since my bayesian filter is trained on my personal email specifically, it tends to become very good. Unlike generic gmail filters for Why did my AOL email stop working?, where there'll always be some mail that ends up in spam no matter how many hundreds of times you mark it not-spam.

It's easy to block all spam, if you don't mind also blocking legitimate mail. What's harder is being confident you're not blocking any legitimate mail. I'm glad you've managed it :. One principle I follow is that I don't drop anything. Every message will either be rejected or delivered, with a narrow band of SpamAssassin scores that delivers to a spam folder. Yup, came here to say pretty much that.

Quickbooks says my email password is incorrect when I’m trying to send an invoice. I use AOL and my password is not incorrect.

It's not nearly as hard as folks make it out to be. Once that's set up you can pretty much forget about it. I haven't had to touch any of my configs in years. I agree, I've been hosting my own email for a few years now, using Mailcow on a Linode. I self-host for 20+ years, the last 12 years on Hetzner. Did some transactional mailings as well professionally.

Not spam, but forum notifications, mailing lists. Gmail was chainging often, Microsoft was blocking everyone. I think self-hosting is easier now than 10 years ago. I've always had success working with the aggressive mail server admin to get unblocked. Often it's just an E-mail to provider-abuse provider.

You started self hosting before Gmail was a thing. This idea that self-hosted email is impossible is wildly overblown. I'd be very surprised if I was on some kind of static whitelist from the early Why did my AOL email stop working? of Gmail. The reality is honestly just that self-hosting mail is not as hard as all the people who don't do it say it is.

You just have no reputation to start with, so you can't expect perfect deliverability from day one. But after some time and we're talking weeks-to-months, not yearsyou'll be fine. Sure if you want a lot of them to go through but not necessarily all. If someone marks your email as spam you may have to start all over again. If you want to send more than a few emails per day you have to warm the ip by sending specific volumes over time. It's doable, easier with a service to help you.

I guess it depends what kind of mail you're sending? I never did any kind of deliberate 'warming up', I just set up the server and then started sending mail. In the first few months people would occasionally see mail from me go to their spam folder, but that hasn't happened in many years. Its just that we're in 2022, not 1997. To those thinking of self-hosting, I would say they should start by understanding modern anti-spam.

Understanding modern anti-spam will not only help them with their inbound email, but will also help them understand how to ensure deliverability of their outbound email too.

And it worked just fine. Surely just a reputation thing, as I had been doing this for over a decade, and all emails were very important password recovery, order details, etcno newsletter or anything. I recently replaced all that with zoho because I wanted something a bit more secure and didn't want to configure it myself. I don't know what experience has to do with it tbh.

Maybe if you have experience working for Microsoft and you can contact the right people there. Have you contacted Sender Support at Microsoft? They're very responsive and if your mail activity is legit they'll certainly help you solve the issue. It sounds like you've got 3 sorted, so maybe 1 or 2 are relevant here. I have been self hosting my private domains for a couple of years now and spam is not a problem with rspamd and it needs very little resources.

Some large hosts just outright blocked me but i always get it unblocked with some assistance of my hoster. So, yes it is fine. I even set up webmail with rainloop. Better than anything once you got it set up right. If the outcomes were different, that's for reasons within their control. That's the whole point of this entire thread!

There is no voodoo in self-hosting mail! Getting everything right, and knowing what you have to get right, comes with experience. I've helped friends set up mail servers fairly often, and they've had the same experience.

There's a lot to say here from both sides - people running their own mail infrastructure like I have for almost 25 years and big mail providers dealing with brutal, unrelenting spam. Why does this practice exist? Who believes that this is decent or acceptable behavior? If gmail doesn't want my inbound message - for any reason - that is just fine.

If they drop it on the floor without telling me that is totally shitty. Once it's been accepted for final delivery, it can no longer be rejected. Mailservers do spam-filtering after accepting for final delivery because spam filtering can be processor-intensive.

Sometimes it's farmed-out to Why did my AOL email stop working? appliance or whatever. It can't rely on the From: address, because you could be sending on behalf of someone else.

There's an awful lot of the kind of server-side spam-filtering that does actually involve delivering: the kind that filters mail into the recipient's spam folder. That mail hasn't been dropped on the floor. It's been delivered, just not to the inbox. You've described how my mailserver should work. I'm willing to stipulate that this is correct and would, in my case, be a difficult problem to solve. But nobody is losing job offers or missing kids' schedules or breaking their summer plans because of my mailserver.

I am talking about gmail. I am talking about yahoo. Their spam heuristics are, in many cases, laughably bad - they are demonstrably, clearly broken. If I email my wife twice daily for 15 years and then one of my responses to her emails gets put in the gmail spam folder. They need to fix this. I don't care how sticky Why did my AOL email stop working? a problem it is. These are mailing lists to which I've been subscribed for a decade, to which I regularly send emails, and which probably have thousands of subscribers.

There is no option for me to whitelist the mailing list, only individual senders, of which there are hundreds. Everything about megacorp spam filtering is broken. Why did my AOL email stop working? in particular forces changes to standards by simply implementing them in their own services. Those changes never make it easier for small-fry postmasters; so I conclude that Google would like all small-fry mailservers to disappear.

Google used to have really good spam filtering; I can only suppose that the reason it's got worse is that they want it worse. Responding gives the sender the ability to better explore the detection Why did my AOL email stop working? space and find a way to get through. Exactly what a legitimate sender wants and what a provider would not want to give an adversary. I think it's a false economy. At best it is security by obscurity. Google tell you why things are spam and often they even return quite detailed error emails when they don't accept stuff it doesn't benefit an attacker that much.

Any decent attacker already knows that they should sign stuff and make identifiers align and can do so trivially easily. People like Yahoo are the opposite and are completely opaque as if they are doing anything that clever.

I would think returned spam would have to be checked for being spam by servers receiving the returned messages. I think that makes it expensive to return spam. A bounce message can be very small, specifying only three fields: To, From, Date to identify the rejected message. The message could be sent to a fixed address, like abuse same. This would be fair, as the sender would know that the mail was not passed on. Then Why did my AOL email stop working? sender knows it didn't go through because it got the error code.

There's nothing to bounce back. That's not wonderful, but it still got delivered and the recipient can go find it in the spam folder. Most people are used to looking there regularly anyway since many of the larger providers coughgooglecough have such terrible false positive rates. The important thing is to never lose email. I run my own mail personal mail server, and do my own spam filtering. I guess my feeling is: if I want to quarantine suspected spam without telling the sender, that's my prerogative -- why does the sender get any say in this?

You can host your own email. Pick a decent hosting provider not the cheapest options around! It's an easy stack to set up and update through several major versions. I'd say give it a go with a new email address, any software that seems manageable to you, and move your usage over gradually. How did you measure your deliverability? If this is true, then congratz for succeeding, but it's still bad advice to give to other people, as most people will not succeed no matter how many hours they put into that.

By the fact I get answers to emails I send to others eg people using gsuite, people using o365and I don't get issues from the sites that I run that use the mail server for sending - it sends confirmation emails for a forum I run, for example.

I know that gmail, o365, yahoo, aol, etc work, because people use those emails to sign up and manage to validate their accounts. I don't agree that most people will not succeed, I know many other people personally who run their own mail servers. It's doable, and it's not nearly as bad as some like to make out.

I don't find this plausible. Now, if you get answers to maybe 30% of emails you send, how do you know the other 70% is just because people didn't write anything back?

How are you ruling out the possibility that some of those 70% never received your email in the first place? So far I haven't encountered a single email provider that successfully delivers 100% of mail sent. Postmark sometimes fails to deliver, SendGrid sometimes fails to deliver, etc.

But you're claiming that you have found the secret sauce and you actually have better deliverability than SendGrid and Postmark - and that's for confirmation emails of all things, the type of mail that very often lands in the spam folder.

Why did my AOL email stop working?

I don't find this plausible. Now, if you get answers to maybe Why did my AOL email stop working? of emails you send, how do you know the other 70% is just because people didn't write anything back? How are you ruling out the possibility that some of those 70% never received your email in the first place? Most of the personal email I send is to companies where Why did my AOL email stop working?

do expect and get responses, or to my family, or to mailing lists. I know family get my emails because they respond. I know companies do because they respond to support queries.

I know mailing lists do because I see my messages in the list archives. Postmark sometimes fails to deliver, SendGrid sometimes fails to deliver, etc.

But you're claiming that you have found the secret sauce and you actually have better deliverability Why did my AOL email stop working?

SendGrid and Postmark - and that's for confirmation emails of all things, the type of mail that very often lands in the spam folder. I do practise good automated email hygiene automatic removal when things bounce permanently, etc. I know family get my emails because they respond. I know companies do because they respond to support queries. I know mailing lists do because I see my messages in the list archives. I do practise good automated email hygiene automatic removal when things bounce permanently, etc.

I care very much if my email ends up in spam folders. But if you're only talking about your email landing in some folderthen sure, you convinced me.

Nobody who is anxious about a first contact with someone new will rely on email alone, anti-spam has made sure of that for 25+ years. Users do complain about unexpected bounce messages often it's an address typo. So I've no problem advising technically-inclined people to give it a go gradually.

You can still measure deliverability with different methods. I've used GlockApps to send test emails to a variety of different inboxes at different providers and it tells me what percent of those emails hit the inbox, what percent went to spam folder, and what percent disappeared.

Watever GlockApps is, there's no way it can tell whether my local rules moved a message to my spam folder. It also can't tell whether my mailserver moved it to spam using my Sieve filters. Therefore it also can't tell Why did my AOL email stop working? the email appeared in my Inbox. The whole reason why dropping email on the floor is A Bad Thing is that doing that makes it impossible to tell whether the message has been delivered at all.

GlockApps can only tell you about the destiny of your outgoing email if the destination was one of a handful of big freemail providers; and I imagine you'd have to provide GlockApps with credentials to the recipient accounts, so that it can see if the mail ended up in Inbox or Spam. You could do that with a few lines of Bash script. There is no email provider that will deliver 100%. As I mentioned in another comment, you can buy a gsuite corporate account and send email from gmail to gmail within your own company and still end up in spam.

If you expect 100% from any solution, you'll be disappointed.

Contact us

Find us at the office

Cudd- Lehnert street no. 7, 84569 New Delhi, India

Give us a ring

Esly Garzone
+76 910 442 603
Mon - Fri, 10:00-16:00

Contact us